The Nature of History at Wikipedia

Here today...

I spend time wandering around Wikipedia, like most people who take a virtual break from computer work. And I occasionally hit the pages that pertain to people I'm affiliated with. I was a bit surprised this time, when I hit the Positron Records page, and saw it was slated for deletion due to unreliability and not being noteworthy. I've noticed this happen to a lot of pages I look at on Wikipedia, but Positron Records seemed like a pretty safe article for years.

This makes me question the historical value of Wikipedia. Something can be noteworthy for years, but as its popularity falls off  and people forget about it, and articles and other references that were written about it disappear as other websites go down and print publications are forgotten, the "editors" that troll Wikipedia are quick to, um, edit. This circumstance indicates to me that Wikipedia is strongly subject to the bias of trends and culture. Rather than an accurate record of our shared history, Wikipedia will be an edited, deleted, and rewritten history. The same strength of having all people able to edit the wiki is the weakness that will bring out that bias.

I suppose it can be argued that truly noteworthy events, places, and people will stand the test of time. And maybe our cultural memory works like our own brain, having a short term and a long term, and needs to forget some things after a while, to make room for new memories.